Chapter II
2.2 Population
and Land Use
2.2.1
Population: Levels,
Growth, Distribution and
Movements
2.2.1.1
Levels
and Growth Pattern
In 1995, Zamboanga City had a
total population of 511,139. It had
increased two and half times over a 25-year
period. This enormous growth may be traced
to the rapid growth experienced between 1970
and 1980, when the City’s population was
increasing at a rate not lower than 5% per
annum. The growth lost its momentum in the
early 80s and plummeted to a rate of 2.55
percent per annum. However, the rate started
to pick up again during the first half of
the decade (1990-1995), registering an
average of 2.74 percent annual growth.
Assuming the persistence of the current rate
of growth, the 1997 mid-year population of
the city is projected at 536, 906.
|
Table II-1.
Population Growth, 1970-1995,
Zamboanga City |
|
Year |
Total Population |
Geometric Growth
Rate (PGR) |
|
1970 (May 1) |
199, 901 |
- |
|
1975 (May 1) |
265, 023 |
5.80 |
|
1980 (May 1) |
343, 722 |
5.34 |
|
1990 (May 1) |
442, 345 |
2.55 |
|
1995 (Sept. 1) |
511, 139 |
2.74 |
To trace the
source of growth of the City, the increase
in population was broken into two
components: natural increase and net
migration. Natural increase is the
difference between the number of births and
the number of deaths during a specified
period. Net migration, on the other hand, is
the difference in-migrants of the city
during the same period. Given the population
levels and the natural increase between
periods, the increase or decrease in
population due to net migration can be
calculated. The following table illustrates
the decomposition of population growth of
Zamboanga City in terms of absolute figures
for the periods 1980-1990 and 1990-1995.
|
Table
II-2. Decomposition of Population
Increases:
1980-1990 and 1990-1995 |
|
Period |
Total
Number of Births |
Total
Number of Deaths |
Natural Increase |
Net
Migration |
|
1980-1990 |
101,
283 |
26,
698 |
74,
585 |
24,
591 |
|
1990-1995 |
58,
677 |
13,
460 |
45,
217 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
To summarize, between 1980
and 1990, 75 percent of the increase in
population was accounted for by natural
increase, and 25 percent by net migration.
However between 1990 and 1995 the
contribution of natural revenue to the
population growth dropped to 70% while
growth due to net migration went up to 30%.
To interpret the
population growth decomposition in terms of
growth rates, the rates of natural increase
(RNI) and the net migration rate (NMR) were
calculated. The results were as follows:
|
Table
II-3. Decomposition of Population
Growths: 1980-1990 and 1990-1995 |
|
Period |
Population Growth Rate (%) |
Rate of
natural Increase (%) |
Net
Migration Rate (%) |
|
1980-1990 |
2.55 |
1.91 |
0.64 |
|
1990-1995 |
2.74 |
1.90 |
0.84 |
The above table indicates
that the rate of growth of the city due to
natural increase remained constant from 1980
to 1995. Net migration rate, on the other
hand, increased by 0.2 percentage points.
Clearly, the increase in the growth rate
from 2.55 percent between 1980 and 1990 to
2.74 percent in 1990-1995 can be attributed
to the increase in the net migration rate.
While the
country experienced a steady and consistent
decline in the population growth rate, both
Region IX as a whole and Zamboanga City
posted an undulating and abrupt pattern of
change in their growth rates. (See table
II-4).
|
Table
II-4 Population Growth Rates:
Philippines, Region IX and Zamboanga
City |
| |
Population Growth Rate (PGR) |
| |
1970-1975 |
1975-1980 |
1980-1990 |
1990-1995 |
|
Philippines |
2.78 |
2.71 |
2.35 |
2.32 |
|
Region
IX |
1.84 |
4.31 |
2.25 |
2.42 |
|
Zamboanga City |
5.80 |
5.34 |
2.55 |
2.74 |
Note: Region
IX’s estimates of growth from 1970 to 1990
included Sulu and Tawi-tawi.
However, it is important to
note that as the country experienced a
significant decline in the population growth
during the period 1980-1990, the respective
growths of the whole region and the city
decelerated at a much faster rate. This
significantly sharp descent coincided with
the intensified population and family
planning campaign program during the 80’s.
Apparently, the program had created a
significant impact on the natural increase
of population in Zamboanga City and the
entire region.
The City’s
population as a percentage of the region’s
population for various periods is presented
in the table below.
|
Table
II-5. Total Population, Region IX
and Zamboanga City: 1970-1995 |
| |
Total
Population |
|
|
Year |
Region
IX |
Zamboanga City |
Percent (%) |
|
1970 |
1,
869, 014 |
199,
901 |
10.70 |
|
1975 |
1,
047, 882 |
265,
023 |
12.94 |
|
1980 |
2,
528, 506 |
343,
722 |
13. 59 |
|
1990 |
3,
157, 865 |
442,
345 |
14. 01 |
|
1995 |
2,
794, 659 |
511,
139 |
18.29 |
Note:
Region IX’s population from 1970 to 1990
included Sulu and Tawi-tawi
The proportion
of the population of Region IX residing in
Zamboanga City rise steadily,
consistently. However, while the population
of the region decreased considerably during
the 1990-1995 period the proportion of the
region’s population accounted for by
Zamboanga City, increased abruptly.
Apparently, this was due to the region to
form the ARMM with other Muslim provinces.
The growth
pattern of Zamboanga City is compared to
other cities of Mindanao in Table II-6. It
is significant to note that while Zamboanga
City had the fastest growing population
between 1970 and 1975 among the four cities,
it lagged behind in the recent years. While
the other three cities were at their peaks
of growth between 1975 and 1980. The peak
growth of Zamboanga City slowed down
slightly
Table
II-6. Population Growth Rates of Selected
Cities: 1970-1995
|
|
Population Growth Rate (PGR) |
|
City
|
1970-1975 |
1975-1980 |
1980-1990 |
1990-1995 |
|
Zamboanga City
Davao City
General Santos City
Cagayan de Oro City |
5.80
4.31
5.18
5.14 |
5.34
4.72
6.59
10.38 |
2.55
3.26
0.97
8.56 |
2.74
3.22
5.14
4.44 |
The abrupt changes in the
population growth patterns of the four
cities could be responses to their rapidly
changing economic and social structures. For
instance, after suffering a very abrupt
declivity in growth during the 1980-1990
period. General Santos City posted a high
5.14 percent annual growth in the next 5-
year period. Apparently, the main reason for
this was the increased volume of
in-migration to the City, which in turn was
influenced by the influx of investors
attracted by the existence development
inputs in the form of major infrastructure
facilities (e.g., fishing port and wharf,
airport facilities, roads, etc.)
2.2.1.2
Population Age-Sex Structure
The age and sex
composition of Zamboanga City’s population
in 1995 is shown in Table II-7 and
graphically illustrated in Figure II-1. The
over-all sex ratio approaches 100, meaning,
there is one male for every female in the
city. In terms, of absolute number, the
males slightly exceeded the females by 148.
The sex ratio, however, is high among the
infants with 107 males per 100 females, and
even higher among elderly group (65 years
and over) with 118 males per females.
|
Table
II-7 Household Population by Sex and
Age Group: Zamboanga City, 1995 |
| |
Total
|
Male |
Female |
|
Age
Group |
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
Number |
Percent |
|
All
Ages |
509,230 |
100.0 |
254, 689 |
100.0 |
253, 541 |
100.0 |
|
Under
1 |
14,
025 |
2.8 |
7, 240 |
2.8 |
6, 785 |
2.7 |
|
1-4 |
53,
876 |
10.6 |
27,
726 |
10.9 |
26,
150 |
10.3 |
|
5-9 |
65,
191 |
12.8 |
33,
156 |
13.0 |
32,
035 |
12.6 |
|
10-14 |
59,
035 |
11.6 |
29,
937 |
11.8 |
29,
098 |
11.4 |
|
15-19 |
61,
402 |
12.1 |
29,
301 |
11.5 |
32,
101 |
12.6 |
|
20-24 |
49,
124 |
9.6 |
23,
747 |
9.3 |
25,
377 |
10.0 |
|
25-29 |
43,
587 |
8.6 |
21,
309 |
8.4 |
22,
278 |
8.8 |
|
30-34 |
36,
646 |
7.2 |
18,
165 |
7.1 |
18,
481 |
7.3 |
|
35-39 |
33,
350 |
6.5 |
16,
772 |
6.6 |
16,
578 |
6.5 |
|
40-44 |
26,
369 |
5.2 |
13,
983 |
5.5 |
12,
386 |
4.9 |
|
45-49 |
19,
852 |
3.9 |
10,
310 |
4.0 |
9, 542 |
3.7 |
|
50-54 |
14,
127 |
2.8 |
7, 329 |
2.9 |
6, 798 |
2.7 |
|
55-59 |
10,
634 |
2.1 |
5, 314 |
2.1 |
5, 320 |
2.1 |
|
60-64 |
8, 239 |
1.6 |
4, 072 |
1.6 |
4, 167 |
1.6 |
|
65-69 |
5, 820 |
1.1 |
2, 739 |
1.1 |
3, 081 |
1.2 |
|
70-74 |
3, 900 |
0.8 |
1, 820 |
0.7 |
2, 080 |
0.8 |
|
75-79 |
2, 116 |
0.4 |
940 |
0.4 |
1, 176 |
0.5 |
|
80-84 |
1, 219 |
0.2 |
509 |
0.2 |
710 |
0.3 |
|
85 &
over |
718 |
0.1 |
320 |
0.1 |
398 |
0.2 |
Source: NSCB,
1995 Census of Population
Figure
II-. Age-Sex Pyramid, Zamboanga City
While it defines the volume
of demand for various goods and services and
supply of human resources, the age-sex
structure of a population distribution
presents important implications for future
population growth, both in terms of
immediate and long-term effects. For
instance, the fact that 54 percent of the
female population of Zamboanga City in 1995
are in their reproductive ages (15-49)
years) and that 49 percent of the females 10
years old and over are currently married may
indicate a rising birth rate at least in the
near future. Moreover, the large number of
females at ages 15-19 who are basically at
the onst of their childbearing span implies
that more births will occur in the next
thirty years.
Another
determinant, however, of fertility of births
as the rate at which women of reproductive
ages are marrying. The annual rates of
increase in marital union among females 10
years old and over in Zamboanga City are
around 3 percent or an additional
2, 370 married
women in a year. This is particularly due to
the changes in marital status among
residents and to a lesser extent, the
in-migration of married women. The age-sex
structure can also be interpreted in terms
of its implications on economic
productivity. Basically, Zamboanga City has
a young population with a mean age of 23.3
years in 1995.
|
Table
II-8 Household Population by Age
Group: Zamboanga City, 1995 |
|
Age
group |
Household Population |
Percent (%) to total |
|
0-14 |
192,
127 |
37.7 |
|
15-64 |
303,
330 |
59.6 |
|
65 &
over |
13,
773 |
2.7 |
|
Total |
509,
230 |
100.0 |
Population growth, over a
period of time, leads to an increase in the
working age
population, a prime
determinant of the labor force supply. The
rapid growth experienced by the city during
the period 1970-1980 resulted in significant
proportion of the population who are at aged
15 to 25 years. Over all, 60 percent of the
total household populations are in their
economically productive years. This pool of
human resources will be beneficial to the
economic expansion of the city.
2.2.1.3
Number
of Households and Household Size
Estimates and
projections of the number of households are
extremely useful in planning especially for
mass housing and other specific types of
utilities. Ideally, the number of households
should grow in proportion to population. In
the case of Zamboanga City, the number of
households grew at a faster rate than its
population – in fact, while, the number of
households increased by around 2.5 times
during the 20-year period the population
grew by 1.9 times between 1975 and 1995. the
gap can be attributed to the increased rates
of household formation caused by the high
marrying rate and household dissolution due
to the tendency of inter-barangay or
short-distance migration among the people of
Zamboanga City.
|
Table
II-9. Number of Households and
Household Size: Zamboanga City,
1975-1995 |
|
Year
|
Number
of Households |
Household Size |
|
1975 |
39,
956 |
6.56 |
|
1980 |
59,
735 |
5.71 |
|
1990 |
81,
321 |
5.40 |
|
1995 |
100,
668 |
5.06 |
Meanwhile household size was
in a declining trend. From 6.56 members in
1975, the size shrunk down to an average of
5.06 in 1995. as far as planning for mass
housing is concerned, information on the
household size is an important input in
determining the ideal size of dwelling
units.
2.2.1.4
Spatial
Distribution of Population
Population is
heavily concentrated in the urban area and
its vicinity leaving a relatively sparsely
populated hinterland. Since 1970, the
concentration of people has been in the city
proper but it is currently showing evidences
of spreading towards the northeast.
Data on
population distribution and population
densities by barangay are presented in Table
II-10 (Annex). It indicates the unbalanced
and skewed spatial distribution of the
city’s population.
Figure II-2
further illustrates the concept of
p[population concentration as a function of
the distance from the city center – that is,
those barangays located nearest to the
center where the City Hall is likely to be
the most densely populated. The urban
barangays of Mariki, Campo Islam, Sta.
Barbara, Sto. Niño, Sta. Catalina and Zone
exhibited the highest population
concentration in terms of inhabitants per
hectare, ranging from 200 to as high as 10
thousand. The latter figure, which refers to
Barangay Mariki, however, is exceptionally
high although it has a very small land area.
Its residents live in houses but on the
coastal waters.
Except from
Taluksangay, Arena Blanco, Tictabon and
Recodo, barangays located beyond the
5-kilometer radius posted a density of not
more than 20 people per hectare in 1995.
2.2.1.5
Population
Movement
Unlike fertility
and mortality, migration can respond quickly
to social and economic changes. Thus,
migration or mobility may be considered as a
component of population change, which can be
substantially influenced by medium or even
short-term interventions.
Because of the
scarcity or even lack of data on migration
or population movements, interferences were
made using the growth pattern of each
barangay in the city. Table II-11 (Annex)
presents an analysis of the migration status
of the 98 barangays of Zamboanga City. The
summary table below shows that even rural
barangays are recipients of migrants; in
fact 26 of the classified rural barangays
are categorized as in-migration areas.
Figure II-2
Population Density vs. Distance from Center:
Zamboanga
City, 1995
|
Table
II-12 Number of Barangays by
Migration Status: Zamboanga
City,1990-1995 (Summary) |
|
Type of Barangay |
In-migration Barangays |
Out-migration Barangays |
Status quo/ unknown |
|
Urban |
13 |
8 |
7 |
|
Rural
|
26 |
22 |
22 |
|
All
Barangays |
39 |
30 |
29 |
The most
prominent receiving barangays include
Divisoria, Calarian, Lunzuran, Talon-talon,
Rio Hondo, Putik and Tugbungan among the
urban classified barangays; and Malagutay,
Arena Blanco, Lapakan, Licomo, Dulian (Upper
Bunguiao), Recodo and Tictabon among the
rural barangays. The out-migration barangays,
on the other hand, include the urban
barangays of Cabatangan and Zones I, II and
III; and the rural barangays of Busay,
Pangapuyan, Latuan, Baluno, Dita, Landang
Laum, and Pamucatan.
The mobility of
population across these barangays takes the
following forms: the migration of farmers to
new arable land another rural area; movement
of landless farmers from depressed barangays
to join the urban informal sector, and
transfer of residence due to peace and order
problem in area of origin.
If current trend
in population growth persist, Zamboanga City
is projected to have the following
population levels:
|
Table
II-13. Population Projections:
Zamboanga City, 1997-2012 |
|
Year |
Total
Population |
Household Population |
|
1997 |
536,
906 |
535,
074 |
|
2000 |
582,
260 |
580,
233 |
|
2006 |
684,
785 |
682,
305 |
|
2012 |
805,
363 |
802,
334 |
Moreover, at the rate population is
increasing (2.74 percent annually), the
present population level of Zamboanga City
is expected to double in 25 years. With the
infusion of more infrastructure facilities
and economic opportunities, there is a
tendency for the rate of population growth
population to accelerate. This acceleration
is due primarily to immigration in
short-term and improved income and health
leading to increased fertility in the
long-term. Given such a situation,
population may eventually double in less
than the expected doubling time of 25 years.
Therefore, addressing the
city’s rate of natural increase through
regulation of fertility or births is
important in order to balance “demands of
population” and “supply of resources”
without sacrificing the environment. Tables
II-14 to 16 (Annex) shows single-year
interval projections of population for each
barangay.
2.2.2 Land Use
Land use
classification is based on data for 1972 and
1993. It is evident that the coverage of
forest and wetlands is declining even as
agricultural and built-up areas continue to
expand. Tables II-17 and II-18 show land
classification for 1972 and 1993
respectively.
|
Table
II-17. Land Classification, 1972 |
|
Land Use type |
Areas (has.) |
Share
(%) |
|
Timberland
|
64,
909. 88 |
45. 68 |
|
Alienable and Disposable (Agriculture) |
64,
455. 97 |
45. 36 |
|
Swamps, Salt beds, Fishponds and
Marshes |
8,
771. 64 |
6. 17 |
|
Urban Area |
3,
962. 50 |
2. 79 |
|
TOTALS |
142,
099.99 |
100.00 |
Source:
Framework Plan, 1975: OCPDC
Note:
1. Total excludes Islands
|
Table
II-8. Land Classification, 1993 |
|
Land Use type |
Areas (has.) |
Share (%) |
|
Forest
|
47,
824. 30 |
33.66 |
|
Watersheds |
10,
560. 00 |
7.43 |
|
Agricultural |
77,
318. 37 |
54.42 |
|
Fishpond |
963.
18 |
0.67 |
|
Built-Up Urban |
5,
424. 04 |
3.82 |
|
TOTALS |
142,
089. 89 |
100.00 |
Source: Master Development
Plan of Zamboanga City (1993-2003):OCPDC
Notes:
1.
Total excludes
Islands
Built-Up/Urban includes Industrial (834.21
has.), Commercial (56.76 has.), Residential
(2.046.44 has.),
Religious (202.24 has) and Government
(2.284.39 has.)
The built-up/urban areas are
heavily concentrated in the city proper and
its environs. The city center has an
unchallenged primacy over the rest of the
city’s areas as almost all urban facilities
are concentrated therein. Schools,
universities, religious institutions,
government institutions, commercial
establishments, industries, the seaport, the
airport, etc. are packed into this area
accounting for the readily apparent
congestion in the city center but commercial
developments are making headway along major
arteries.
The urban area
has a tendency to expand in a linear manner
in finger-like extensions following the
alignment of the roads radiating out of the
city center:
Expansion, however, is seen to occur more
rapidly along the Zamboanga City-Pagadian
National Road, the main northeastern
corridor.
The hinterland
is still largely agricultural. Wide tracts
of ricelands, coconut and fruit plantations
characterize the East Coast. There are also
three hubs of activities in this area. First
is Singali where the Zamboanga City Fish
Port Complex and 100-MW Power Plant are
located. The two other hubs are Curuan and
Vitali, which are located in road
convergence point’s sub-centers of trade in
the rural area. The West Coast, on the other
hand, also hosts rice lands and fruit
plantations although not on the same sclae
as those on the East Coast. It is an
Emergent trading and Industrial area with
the Regional Agro-Industrial Center in Ayala
and the Zamboanga Ecozone in San Ramon.
2.2.3 Land Supply
and Demand Analysis
The supply and
demand situation will be analyzed for urban
and agricultural uses particularly for rice
production. Land supply is determined
through the traditional models of
Eco-Engineering and Sieve Analysis. Urban
land will be determined using the Aggregate
Model while agricultural land demand shall
be ascertained using the Food Balance Model.
After
considering the supply and demand situation
for urban and agricultural lands, the water
carrying capacity of the City will be looked
into. This shall serve as a benchmark in
determining the minimum population levels
that the aquifers can handle without
segmentation. This shall also be a critical
guide in determining permissible intensity
of the City’s socio-economic activities
considering the available groundwater.
2.2.3.1
Urban Land Supply and Demand Analysis
Lands that are
available for urban expansion are those not
included in the Protected Areas for
Agriculture, the Environmentally Constrained
Areas and the Existing Built-Up Areas.
Two supply
situations exist. They differ mainly because
off slope limitations and the stipulations
of the Revised Forestry Code. The first
situation determines the Gross Supply, which
implies the absolute limits of urban
expansion or the “Boundary Threshold”.
Beyond which no urban development shall be
allowed. This is primarily defined by the
50% and above slope line along with the
other limiting factors indicated in Table
II-19. Zamboanga City’s Gross Supply is
estimated to be 51, 676 has.
The second
situation determines the Net Supply or the
“First Threshold”. The 18% to 50% slope
range marks this, which are “conditional”
restricted for urban use. Assuming that the
Net Supply can cope up with the projected
demand, then it may not be advisable to
allow extensive urban development to cross
the “First Threshold”. The City’s Net Supply
is estimated to be at 36, 005 has.
|
Table
II-19. Land Supply Accounting for
Urban Use |
|
Total Land Area |
|
148,383.49 |
| Less
Protected Areas for Agriculture |
5,168 |
|
|
Less
Environmentally Constrained Areas |
86,252 |
|
|
Less
Existing Built-Up Areas |
5,424 |
|
|
Gross
Area Available for Urban Expansion
(Boundary Threshold) |
|
51,676 |
|
Less
18% to 50 % slope |
15,671 |
|
|
Net
Area Available for Urban Expansion
(First Threshold) |
|
36,005 |
Note:
1. Built-up area size based on 1993 data.
2. Protected
Agricultural areas include irrigated and
identified potentially irrigable lands as
reported by NIA Region IX
In order to estimate how
large a population can be supported by the
remaining urbanizable land, the net land
carrying capacity is determined. If the
first threshold is considered, the net
carrying capacity ranges from over 100,000
to over four million people. Should the
boundary threshold be considered, the
maximum population might be around six
million people. From these estimates, the
additional projected population of 322,100
by the year 2012 may still be accommodated,
considering land supply alone.
Map II-7 the
Environmentally Critical areas.
|
Table
II-20 Net Land Carrying Capacity,
First Threshold |
|
Measurement Parameter |
Persons per hectare |
No.
Of persons |
|
Based on
City Density |
3.24 |
|
|
Based on
Urban Area Density |
38.61 |
1,
390, 131 |
|
Based on
Urban Core Density |
119.24 |
4,
293, 163 |
|
Based on
FAO Standards |
125.00 |
4,
500, 625 |
Note:
1.
Population
figures based on 1993 estimates.
2.
Net land
carrying capacity pertains to the estimated
number of people that can be accommodated in
the areas identified for urban expansion.
FAO
Standards specify 8 hectares per 1, 000
population.
|
Table
II-21. Net Land Carrying Capacity,
Boundary Threshold |
|
Measurement Parameter |
Persons per hectare |
No. Of
persons |
|
Based on
City Density |
3.24 |
167,
303 |
|
Based on
Urban Area Density |
38.61 |
1,
995, 198 |
|
Based on
Urban Core Density |
119.24 |
6,
161, 800 |
|
Based on
FAO Standards |
125.00 |
6,
459, 561 |
In estimating the projected
demand for urban land by the year 2012, an
Aggregate Model was used based on current
density or the space utilization factor per
capita. For an additional population of 322,
100, the demand for urban land may range
from 2, 577 to nearly 100, 000 has.
|
Table II-22. Estimated Demand for
Urban Land, Year 2012 |
|
Demand
Parameter |
Based
on City Density |
Based
on Urban Area Density |
Based
on Urban Core Density |
Based
on FAO Standards |
|
Urban
Land Demand (has.) |
99,
490 |
8, 343 |
2, 701 |
2, 577 |
Supply for urban land is
still ample if densities will not be based
upon the very low value of 3, 24 persons per
hectare, which is the Gross City Density.
Further, the First Threshold is still
capable of absorbing population growth.
|
Table
II-23. Urban Land Demand-supply Gap |
|
Threshold |
Based
On City Density |
Based
On Urban Area Density |
Based
on Urban Core Density |
Based
on FAO Standards |
|
First
Threshold |
63,
485 |
27,
662 |
33,
304 |
33,
428 |
|
Boundary Threshold |
47,
814 |
43,
334 |
48,
975 |
49,
100 |
2.2.3.2
Agricultural
Land Demand and Supply Analysis
Since the demand
for urban land normally conflicts with
agricultural areas, the demand for
agricultural land in order to fully support
the population shall be ascertained. Demand
will be estimated using a Food Balance Model
where the nutritional requirements of the
population are assumed to be fully met.
Looking
particularly at the staple crops, the City
requires a total of 61, 331 MT of rice and
26,285 MT of corn, to fully feed the
population projected for the year 2012
population (Table II-24). Assuming that the
City will internally produce all these, it
would need 12, 315 has. of rice and 14,603
has corn lands cropped at an estimated
intensity of 1.5 times per year (Table
II-25). With the hectarage of planted area
in 1993, there will be a land deficit of 7,
056 has. for rice and 9, 990 has. for corn.
With the City’s prime agricultural lands
estimated to be at 5, 168 has, becomes
apparent that food self-sufficiency for
staple crops cannot be attained (Table II-26).
Table
II-24. Estimated Food Requirements
|
Food
Crop |
FNRI
capita per year requirement (kgs.) |
Requirements (M.T.) Food
|
|
Present Demand Year 1993 |
Projected Demand Year 2012 |
|
|
109.
20 |
36,
710 |
61,
331 |
|
Corn |
109.
20 |
15,
733 |
26,
285 |
|
Vegetables |
54. 75 |
26,
293 |
43,
928 |
|
Root
Crops |
60. 59 |
29,
098 |
48,
614 |
Note:
1.
Assume 70%
and 30% of population utilize rice and corn
as staple food, respectively. Ration based
on Zamboanga City’s 1998 SEPP.
2.
Vegetable
Include Leafy, Fruit and Legumes
3.
Fruits were
not included since no data was available.
Demand based
on population divided by FNRI requirement.
Table II-25.
Estimated Yield and land Area Requirements
|
Food
Crop |
Yield and
Land Area Requirement |
|
Effective Estimated Yield/ha.(MT) |
Gross
Land Area Reqm’t (has.) 1993 |
Gross
Land Area Reqm’t (has.) 2012 |
Net
Land Area Reqm’t (has.) 1993 |
Net
Land Area Reqm’t (has.) 2012 |
|
Rice
|
3.32 |
11,
057 |
18,473 |
7,371 |
12,
315 |
|
Corn |
1.20 |
13,
111 |
21,904 |
8,740 |
14,603 |
|
Vegetables |
7.05 |
3, 730 |
6,231 |
2,486 |
4,154 |
|
Root
Crops |
6.40 |
4,547 |
7,596 |
3,031 |
5,064 |
|
TOTAL |
|
32,444 |
54,204 |
21,629 |
36,136 |
Note;
1.
Effective
estimated yield based on 1992 data from DA.
2.
Gross land
area requirement (GLAR) equals demand over
effective estimated yield per ha.
3.
Net land
area requirement obtained during the GLAR by
an assumed value of 1.5 representing
cropping intensity.
TABLE
II-26. Land Requirement and
Surplus/Deficit
|
Food
Crop |
Land Requirement and Supply/Deficit |
Area
Planted
(has.) 1993 |
Area
Reqm’t
(has.) 1993 |
Surplus (Deficit) |
Area
Reqm’t
(has.) 2012 |
Surplus (Deficit) |
|
Rice
|
5, 260 |
7,371 |
(2,112) |
12,315 |
(7,056) |
|
Corn |
4,613 |
8,740 |
(4,128) |
14,603 |
(9,990) |
|
Vegetables |
1,360 |
2,486 |
(1,126) |
4,154 |
(2,794) |
|
Root
Crops |
1,138 |
3,031 |
(1,893) |
5,064 |
(3,926) |
|
TOTAL |
12,370 |
21,629 |
(9,259) |
36,136 |
(23,766) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Population
Density Map 1970
Population
Density Map 1975
Population
Density Map 1980
Population
Density Map 1985
Population
Density Map 1990
Population
Density Map 1995
Activity
Centers Map
Environmentally Critical Areas Map
|